| : |
中, 语 |
|---|---|
| : | |
| : | |
| : |
1,3 . |
| : |
1 |
| : | |
| : | |
| ISO 639-1: |
zh |
| ISO 639-2: |
chi (B); zho (T) |
| ISO 639-3: |
zho . |
| . : : | |
́ ́ (. . , . 语, : hànyǔ, .: , . . 中, : zhōngwén, .: ) ( «» , , , [1]); - (-) . .
|
|
[]
[]
6 . , ( 90 % ). , , , - ( 75 % ); .
- , , , . -, . , , [2].
[]
10 : ( , 800 ), , , (), (湘), (赣), (家), (), (). ( , ), , , . , (普), (华语) (国语), , , .
[]
, , , , , [3].
[]
2 : , , , , .
, . , , ; . - , - . .
2004 . . , , . .
[]
, , (XIVXI . .). -. XX ., .
; , (. . 聖歎, . 叹, 1610?1661). XX . .
| . |
[]
[]
. 414 [4], 1324 ( 4 , 1 4 )[5]. , . . . : .
, (« »), 400 . « » (, 1987), 18 , [6].
[]
, , . . () . [5].
, .
, , , , , . , 脑 , . , 脑 , . -. , , 克 (kelong) ''. , , 士 (bāshì) '' ( . bus) , . , .
. . , (men), , , .
, : , () : . , . ., ; «» (, ) .
; ( ), . , .
«» «». . . - , .
[]
: «», (-, . . , : xiǎo míng), (, . . , : míng), (, . . , : zì), (, . . , : hào). 1980- , «» [8].
: , . ( -), [8] ( ). : ( . . , : Lǐ), ( . . 王, : Wáng), ( . . 张, : Zhāng)[8].
[]
- (. . , . 语, : chéngyŭ, : « ») .
- (. . , . 语, : yànyŭ)
- (. . 後, . 语, : xiēhòuyǔ, : « ») -
- (. . 慣, . 语, : guànyòngyŭ, : « »)
- (. . , . 语, : súyǔ, : « »)
[]
[9]. , , .
[]
- *David Crystal, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 312. «The mutual unintelligibility of the varieties is the main ground for referring to them as separate languages.»
- Charles N. Li, Sandra A. Thompson. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar (1989), p 2. «The Chinese language family is genetically classified as an independent branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family.»
- Jerry Norman. Chinese (1988), p.1. «The modern Chinese dialects are really more like a family of languages».
- John DeFrancis. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy (1984), p.56. «To call Chinese a single language composed of dialects with varying degrees of difference is to mislead by minimizing disparities that according to Chao are as great as those between English and Dutch. To call Chinese a family of languages is to suggest extralinguistic differences that in fact do not exist and to overlook the unique linguistic situation that exists in China.»
- -
- «What is the Chinese language?» The Economist, Dec 13th 2011
- , 397 420 . .: (恭士) ? (究竟音节?-- ?) // (中国语),1958,№ 4. : . . . ., 2007. . 20
- 1 2 . . // . 1990. . 225. ISBN 5-85270-031-2.
- . . . // : : 5 . 2006-- . 3. . . ., 2008. . 643.
- «@»
- 1 2 3 .., .. // . .: , 1989. . 164-170.
- . .
[] .
[]
- . . . ., 2005
- -. / . . .. . .: , 1965. 55 . 1200 .
- . . . . .: -, , 2005. 576 . 3000 . ISBN 5-9564-0015-3
- . . . ., 2007
- : 5 . ., 2006 . . 3. . . 2008. 727 . « » . . . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . . . .
[]
[]
[]
[]
| . : |
| | () | () | | () | | | | ( ) | ()| | - | |
| | | ( | ) | | | | | |
| | | - | - | | - | - | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
| | () | |
| | | |